lichess.org
Donate

Could Russia have 50.000 Hidden Nukes, instead of the estimated 10.000?

Ask a flat earther. They probably have a boatload of conspiracy theories to keep you entertained.
@LordSupremeChess said in #3:
> Ask a flat earther. They probably have a boatload of conspiracy theories to keep you entertained.
This man is smart, I can't deny this. People are using the answers I would use as if they're reading my brain.
Russia is already dealing with a toxic dictatorship ( Putin ) why would they need more toxic weapons?
to @Mopman said in #5:
> Russia is already dealing with a toxic dictatorship ( Putin ) why would they need more toxic weapons?
to be toxic you need to have toxic things
@KevinWZG said in #6:
> to be toxic you need to have toxic things
Doesn't he already have toxic brain cells? Or are brain cells nonexistent?
@LordSupremeChess said in #7:
> Doesn't he already have toxic brain cells? Or are brain cells nonexistent?
i dunno what he got in his brain but it should be very toxic
@LordSupremeChess said in #7:
> Doesn't he already have toxic brain cells? Or are brain cells nonexistent?
He meant to be funny, because nukes are toxic, and to be toxic you need to have toxic things, nukes.
And for the title, who cares how many nukes Putin has? One nuke is enough to destroy a consequent portion of the map, so why speculate about how many he possesses?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.