| General Chess Discussion - Kramnick's Current Study Of Cheating In On-Line Chess#27 @kalafiorczyk said in #25: > Here are two papers explaining the statistical approach used by Kramnik and his mathematician friends: > > web.stanford.edu/class/hrp259/2007/regression/storke.pdf > www.r… | pokraise  |
| General Chess Discussion - Kramnick's Current Study Of Cheating In On-Line Chess#23 @kalafiorczyk said in #4: > Kramnik's analysis analyzed by a professional data scientist: > > dorianquelle.github.io/blog/Cheating-In-Titled-Tuesday/ > > As the old saying goes: lies, damned lies, and… | pokraise |
| Lichess Feedback - Puzzled by puzzles#2 I think this puzzle is just a classic case where the most direct and natural moves happen to be right due to much more complex reasons. So people who guess the move get it right decreasing it's rating… | pokraise |
| General Chess Discussion - How real is the rating of puzzles with respect to the ELO rating?#3 Since the lichess's puzzles are untimed the correlation should be very weak. | pokraise |
| General Chess Discussion - Are top players not playing real chess these days? (compared to computers)#21 @JuergenWerner said in #11: > If chess is a draw then 100% of engine vs engine games will be a draw!!! They are already. Games without book between top engines are always draw. Even for testing new ve… | pokraise |