As far as I know, this is the first game in which I didn't make a single inaccuracy, according to the lichess computer:
What it requires is
1) a few moves of an opening line you know
2) an opening line your opponent doesn't seem to know too well
3) followed by an early defensive oversight
Good summary. I've only had two "perfect" games that I know of, both with the same opening (Queen's pawn stonewall attack, which I know like the back of my hand).
Both times, after reading the computer analysis, I thought to myself, "I hope my opponent doesn't think I cheated."
Nice one jokido, and it was against a higher rated opponent too!
Nice Job!
1 slight critique: Magnus Carlsen's average centipawn loss was 5 in this game:
http://en.lichess.org/jMVMo1Ua Yours was 11. Still, you have done something very hard to do. Nice job, once again!
Not to mention you are not Magnus Carlsen :)
I think I've had a few games with the acp under 10, but always involving some move that triggered the inaccuracy counter at some point. I should have mentioned as a fourth factor that black took a lot of time, which took away a lot of the pressure
I just had a triple zero game myself - I never grow tired of them :D Weirdly enough my opponent seemed to know the opening, but blundered immediately after ~10 moves. Quite unusual, because if you know that you should play Na3 in the Advanced French, you should know that you have to play Nc2 after cxd4 cxd4.
Other than that, I agree with your list. I'd like to add that it might help that your opponent are a bit lower rated than you as well.
Here's the game if anyone would like to have a look:
en.lichess.org/QwqkKyXY/black#1The engine didn't critisize any moves, nevertheless I think the opening was not played well by White. Instead ...Nxd5, which opens the game and leaves black with an ugly pawn structure, black is better after ...cxd5. Black has excellent center control and can in the middle game press on the b- and c-file. Of course white is active, but black is still better. I guess all players with a real life rating over 2000 and experience in the Sicilian would agree.
So the game is not played perfectly, but I want to add, that I myself did not play any game without inaccuties in the last four years. I don't want to offensive, just frank.
I agree they are not perfect games, but they count as peculiarities :)
My second one, although this time I have no idea how I did it. Just an opponent who played a bit carelessly is all
en.lichess.org/KrxZu4py/
