lichess.org
Donate

To reach 4000 rating, how many victories in a row...

Against 2500 rating opponents in average do you believe it would be necessary? 10000, 100000, a million...
Let's post our hypotheses
I believe that about 100000 in a row
if a 3700 win to a 2500.....he will win 0 points
You can calculate it out. But I do not have the formula so I cant do it or I would. :)
Yes, there is the formula but complicated, this problem is an occurrence caused by boring time jaja
Reaching a rating of 4000 online in any chess variant is very easy so easy that there is no point doing it + it would be dodgy so thats why i will never try it. But to reach a rating of 4000 in person is impossible no human in the world will ever reach that rating unless Fide changes the rating system in a radical way.
@DST001 to reach 4000 rating you need to consistently beat opponents rated 3500+. There are no such here so it's impossible because you won't get any rating points by beating weak players like me even if you do it 1000 times in row. You are almost there but you haven't got any rating points whatsoever by doing it.
@DST001
Congratulations for your current streak of 407 Bullet wins! To prove my point you can see that your rating remains unchanged.
@Tangelo777 you are thinking inside the box think outside of the box there can be many 3500+ players on this site if they wanted to be therefore making it possible to reach a rating of 4000 it is technically possible to reach a rating of 10,000 or higher if players really wanted to. But they are not going to attempt it as it will be dodgy

@Tangelo777 even you can reach a rating of 4000 if you really want to but you wont try it as it will be ethically wrong in a way.
but does the formula dictate that points gained will actually go to zero? or is it an infinitesimal gain? sometimes 2500 players beat me and gain 1pt sometimes they gain 0. I assume this is because they average fewer than 1 pt per victory against players rated at my level.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.