@for_cryingout_loud said in #6:
> How would you know that i have a chess board out are you watching me?
There's the rub. They aren't and AFAIK, they can't. (You nation's spy service/secret police, that's another matter) You're on your honour here. As you are with computer assistance, but with computer assistance they can get a pretty fair idea over time of who is and isn't using. If statistical evidence isn't an oxymoron.
I find it interesting that they permit users to set up a physical board and play the moves on that board first, so long as they are not using the physical board for analysis. How you could enforce that so that it didn't degenerate into cheating is beyond me.
> How would you know that i have a chess board out are you watching me?
There's the rub. They aren't and AFAIK, they can't. (You nation's spy service/secret police, that's another matter) You're on your honour here. As you are with computer assistance, but with computer assistance they can get a pretty fair idea over time of who is and isn't using. If statistical evidence isn't an oxymoron.
I find it interesting that they permit users to set up a physical board and play the moves on that board first, so long as they are not using the physical board for analysis. How you could enforce that so that it didn't degenerate into cheating is beyond me.